Apologies in advance for the long- windedness nature of this response and
for top- posting.
The following arrangements applied prior to maintenance transferring back to
Network Rail. (I assume that current arrangements are little different.)
Subsequent to a bridge strike, the line is inspected by two people. One is
the on- call local P/Way supervisor, the other a bridge examiner, both from
the maintenance contractor. They each assess their relevant aspects (ie the
bridge examiner the structure and the P/Way supervisor the track). Following
this, a TSR may or may not be implemented, either for the condition of the
track, the condition of the bridge or both.
TSR boards are set out in the cess by the local P/Way gang under instruction
from the relevant person of authority (see above). They are arranged in the
direction of traffic as follows:
WARNING BOARD
+
braking distance
+
SPEED BOARD (often referred to as the C board)
+
length of TSR (in the case of a bridge strike, probably the length of the
bridge)
+
TERMINATION BOARD (T board)
Boards are reflective reflective signs, the warning board having the speed
limitation (5, 20, 50 etc.) on a square board with a seperate rectangular
board below it showing two white reflective circles (commonly referred to as
a fishtail). The C board will have the speed limitation on a square
board, the T board a letter T.
However, there are such things as differential TSRs. This is where the
warning and C boards display two speeds above the fishtail. The top speed
will usually be lower and this is the TSR at which locos, bogie stock,
freight trains etc. must travel. The lower speed, which will be higher, is
the speed at which DMUs (and I think parcels trains) must travel. However in
my experience, differential speeds are rarely applied following bridge
strikes. Its usually a blanket (all one speed) TSR of either 5 or 20 mph,
or traffic stopped completely, depending upon the damage to the track and/
or structure.
My first thought when you mentioned the EWS train travelling slower/
stopping than the passengers was that a differential TSR had been applied,
with freight obviously travelling slower. I now think that the more likely
explanation is that either one or both of the examiners had not yet reached
the scene and the signaller was cautioning trains over the section of track.
(This is where the signaller will stop a train at the nearest controllable
signal in advance of the incident and warn the driver to pass the relevant
stratch at caution). However, the definition of caution from one driver,
p/way man, signaller etc. to another is often blurred (I believe the Rule
Book definition can be vague too but I dont have one to hand to check),
hence the probable reason all the trains you witnessed passed over the
bridge at different speeds.
Again, I am not totally sure of that last paragraph as the usual situation
is for a line to be stopped completely until the examiners arrive on the
scene and pass it fit for traffic at whatever speed. Perhaps someone more
informed may enlighten us of the nature of the incident?
db.
Neil McDonald wrote in message
news:1082235505.52128.1@iris.uk.clara.net...
> After a recent bridge strike by a lorry in Edinburgh (where St. Margarets
> steam shed used to be) I noticed that all the different operating
companies
> used a different speed over the bridge. The EWS driver on the binliner
to
> Dunbar stopped, got out and had a look at the bridge whereas Scotrail
trains
> crawled over it, GNER used walking pace and Virgin about 20-30mph. Who
sets
> the speed limit and how is that limit communicated to the various
companies
> and their drivers?
>
> --
> Neil McD.
>
>