Mr Invisible wrote in message
news:3418dd7c.0405111240.16acbbbc@posting.google.com...
>
> Im sure this has been brought up on here before, but isnt it
> ridiculous that making an equivalent short-medium haul European
> journey by plane should be so much cheaper than by train when the
> operating costs of the former are higher.
But unfortunately they are not.
The plane only has to contribute to its infrastructure costs when it
takes off and lands (and a small amount for signalling aka ATC
when in the air) A 1000 mile train journey has to pay for the cost
of providing 1000 miles of track
> Obviously the lack of a tax
> on aviation fuel has got something to do with it...
It makes a difference, but its not the whole story.
> If the market
> operated fairly and logically then the situation would be different.
It would be nice if we could charge airlines for use of airspace
but it seems that we cant
tim
>
> Also in addition to pricing issues (again, Im sure this has been
> brought up before) surely theres a big case to be made for having
> better integration between Eurostar and inter-city services in
> Britain, or maybe even Eurostar operating direct services once or
> twice a day to places like Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, etc. I
> guess theres problems limiting this - eg, capacity constraints, etc,
> but if they ever sorted this out think what a boost it would be for
> the regions.